Male speed dating
Male speed dating - michael oher dating collins
The second chart gives the impression that the mode of the % matches distribution is around 15 rather than 0.
If you can correctly guess the probability of getting a yes, that should help a lot.
What's nice about a Random Forest is that it can show you the predictor importance estimates based on how error increases if you randomly change the value of particular predictors.
If they don't matter, it shouldn't increase the error rate much, right?
Based on those scores, the most important features are: scores indicate how much more attractive the partners were relative to the participants.
As you can see, people tend to say yes when their partners are more attractive than themselves regardless of gender.
Does that mean people who made fewer matches were more picky and didn't request another date as often as those who were more successful? match rate - if they correlate, then we should see a diagonal line!
Most people are more selective about who they go out with for second date.
In these experiments, you each met all of you opposite-sex participants for four minutes.
The number of the first dates varied by the event - on average there were 15, but it could be as few as 5 or as many as 22.
If you take the mean ratings and then subtract the self-rating from the peer rating, you see that participants thought others were more into looks while they were also into sincerity and intelligence. If both you and your partner request another date after the first one, then you have a match.
What percentage of initial dates resulted in matches?
If relative attractiveness is one of the key factors in our decision to say "yes", how good are we at assessing our own attractiveness?